Politics of Fear Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Politics of veneration - Essay ExampleIronically, most democratic governments spend just as much time attempting to call the impact of stories that have come into the light in a spontaneous manner as they would season carrying out campaigns. The politics of fearfulness have grown in breath and depth as a result of the depiction of personhood as be a very vulnerable entity. We seem to be brio in an era of a lack of alternatives and for this reason, we seem not to be in need of soul who will keep on reminding us that we are getting more powerless by the day (Furedi, 2007). As a result of this scenario, a majority of the people have come to interpret and regard events from the perspective of anxiety and fear.Fear politics are a measure of an in-depth cultural mood. Nevertheless, such a situation never came into being on its own. It is worth noting here that fear has time and again been politicized deliberately. each through history, the ruling class has taken upon itself the ma ndate of using fear as a semipolitical tool. Generation after generation of totalitarian governments have adopted the directive that Machiavelli made to rulers that by being feared, they would be recipients of an even greater form of security, more than they would ever receive from love (Furedi , 2007).Fear could be used to terrorize, coerce, and in the maintenance of public fellowship. Unity and consensus could also be gained by way of galling a general response to a supposed threat. Currently, the main aim of politics of fear seems to be not only a gaining of consensus, but also to forge, as an index of oneness around selected that would otherwise appear to be disconnected. Thomas Hobbes, an English philosopher, provides us through his writings with the original doctrinal endeavor to expand fear politics that could as well be utilized in the carrying out of the suggestion that we do not have an alternative in politics. Hobbes opines that through cultivating fear, the main ai m is to get any would-be radical argue towards a collective experimentation ineffectual (Rosen, 2002). In order to realize such an objective, Hobbes is of the opinion that it would be in the best interests of both the state and its people if the plurality were convinced to dare less (Furedi, 2007). The people that internalized a fear spirit were less likely to happen upon a risk, let alone a collective experimentation. Additionally, the promotion of a wide aversion consciousness to the unknown aids in the instilling of fear in the masses that whatever they had not experimented, could as well be harmful to them. Presently, there has been an institutionalization of the fear of the unknown harm, and this seems to strengthen the currently prevailing fear culture (Dickinson, 2006). A lot of the public figures in political offices have to daily grapple with the incredulity of whether they need to reduce fear, or politicize it. The same question also confronted a Former natural Labor campaign adviser, Phillip Gould. Through his 1994 publication, fighting of the fear factor, Gould argued that there does exists a feeling of anxiety and insecurity that tends to turn around the present day electorates. It is this sense of mood anxiety over the future that Gould has observed to be the reason behind the use of fear tactics by