Character Analysis †Achilles Essay

In Homers epical The Iliad the briny character, Achilles, is non really the typical run of the mill hero. Even though he is a great warrior he doesnt come reach as one in the epic. His furiousness constantly comes up when his feelings undertake hurt or someone insults him. Because of this he stops fighting with his testify people all because he has been offended by his commander, Agamemnon. It is not gutter after his paladin gets killed in battle that he re-enters the war, only once all over again because of his temper has everyplacetaken him. This lunacy continues on after he avenges his friends death but his anger is finally resolved when strong-arms father Priam comes asking for his dead sons body. Even though Achilles was a very swift tempered man, in the end he did finally leaven some sympathy for another.In the beginning of the epic Achilles was not in the battle because of his anger. As Fenno (2008) stated that Athena urged him to not go into battle while he wa s angry against Agamemnon (para. 6). Because he felt up slighted by Agamenon he just sat by the ships for most of the epic. Lombardo (2009) in any case stated that just to spite his commander he withdrew from battle receivable to his anger (p. 1790). Again one can see that his anger was the result cause of why he did not enter into battle.After decision out that Achilles friend, Patroclus, was killed in battle his rage again then took over and he entered the battle. Fenno (2008) quoted that Hector will not cease from fighting until much(prenominal) time as Achilles rouses himself on the day when battle rages around a slain Patroclus (para.7). This shows the rage that Achilles brought up inside of him due to his fallen friend. Lombardo (2009) as well as stated that because of Achilles wrath and withdrawal from entering into battle, caused a heavy wake upon the Achaeans but to a greater extent so upon Achilles himself (p. 170). Here you can see how he probably felt guilty of hi s friends death in battle and how this rage was a way to make amends.Once Achilles entered into the battle, his rage was focused more on vengeance upon Hector. After Achilles and Hector stopped running, as shown by Lombardo (2009), Hector tried to cut a deal with Achilles, but Achilles alluded that he hated him to the core, comparing a wolves to a lamb, and would not honor his demand to not dishonor his corpse (p. 248). Also after the death of Hector he then took his body, tied it to a chariot and dragged it around (p. 252). This rage kept continuing on after he had a funeral for his friend Patroclus as shown again by his need to drag Hectors corpse around Patroclus tomb 3 times (p. 255).Lombardo (2009) shows that once world power Priam came to Achilles begging for his body, he was physically moved by the sight of the King, and remembered that he too has a father that he would never see again and both of them wept together (pp. 170-171). This is where Achilles softer side finally comes out and allows for Hectors body to be returned to Priam for proper burial. Now after all the rage has left Achilles, he is now at peace with himself which could be because of his in short to come fate.Achilles, character wise, does not develop or change over the course of the Iliad for the most part. With the death of his friend Patroclus he is prompted to seek chord from Agamemnon, but that focuses his rage toward Hector. Due to this his lust for vengeance and his overwhelming congratulate overtake him. He ends up desecrating Hectors body at the funeral of his dead friend Patroclus. It was not until King Priam came begging for Hectors body that Achilles was free from his anger and returned the body to King Priam because of the memory of his father, Peleus. This shows that in the end, even though Achilles had a great temper, he was able to show his softer side and slightly transform into a kinder person.